Hannoun v R Ltd

JurisdictionCayman Islands
Judge(Henderson, J.)
Judgment Date18 March 2009
CourtGrand Court (Cayman Islands)
Date18 March 2009
Grand Court

(Henderson, J.)

HANNOUN
and
R LIMITED and BANQUE SYZ COMPANY LIMITED

Ms. S.J. Collins for the petitioner;

A.A. Galatopoulos and M.J. Crawford for the first respondent.

Cases cited:

(1) Bolton (H.L.) Engr. Co. Ltd., In re, [1956] Ch. 577; [1956] 2 W.L.R. 844; [1956] 1 All E.R. 799, referred to.

(2) Company (No. 003160 of 1986), In re a, [1986] BCLC 391; (1986), 2 BCC 99276, referred to.

(3) Exclusive Master Book-Binding & Mfg. Pty. Ltd., ReUNK(1977), 2 ACLR 549, referred to.

(4) Great Wheal Busy Mining Co., In reELR(1871), L.R. 6 Ch. App. 196, referred to.

(5) Hayim v. Citibank N.A., [1987] A.C. 730; [1987] 3 W.L.R. 83, not followed.

(6) Humber Ironworks & Ship-building Co., In reELR(1875), 1 Ch.D. 576, referred to.

(7) Kelly v. MawsonUNK(1982), 6 ACLR 667, referred to.

(8) National Bank of Wales Ltd., In re, [1907] 1 Ch. 582, referred to.

(9) Pimlico Capital Ltd., Re, [2002] BCLC 544; [2002] EWHC 878 (Ch), referred to.

(10) Svanstrom v. Jonasson, 1997 CILR 192, referred to.

Legislation construed:

Companies Law (2007 Revision), s.96:

‘Any application to the Court for the winding up of a company shall be by petition which may be presented by the company, or by any one or more than one creditor or contributory of the company, or by all or any of the above parties, together or separately; and every order which may be made on any such petition shall operate in favour of all creditors and all the contributories of the company in the same manner as if it had been made upon the joint petition of a creditor and contributory.’

Companies-compulsory winding up-petition-beneficiary unable to petition for winding up of company whose shares held on trust, if trustee himself unwilling to petition-need to consider interests of all creditors and contributories and not solely those of unknown beneficiary with mere indirect interest

The petitioner sought the winding up of the respondent fund on the just and equitable ground.

The petitioner was not a shareholder of the fund but the beneficiary of a bare trust of which the second respondent was trustee. The trustee was the legal owner of shares in the fund but refused to petition for winding up in its own name because of a conflict of interest with its other clients.

The petitioner acknowledged that the beneficiary of a bare trust was not a contributory and that he could not therefore bring a winding-up petition under s.96 of the Companies Law (2007 Revision) but...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • David Xiao Ying Gao v China Biologic Products Holdings, Inc.
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 10 Diciembre 2018
    ...CILR 59 (CICA-Zacca P at page 69)), Svanstrom -v- Jonasson [1997] CILR 192 (CICA-Telford Georges JA at page 203), Hannoun -v- R Limited [2009] CILR 124, Re Lancelot Investors Fund Limited (in official liquidation) [2015] 1 CILR 328 (CICA-Martin JA at paragraphs 17, Plaintiff's submissions 5......
  • The Companies Act (2023 Revision) and Juniper Life Sciences Ltd
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 23 Octubre 2023
    ...by virtue of Companies Winding Up Rules (“CWR”) Order 3, rule 2(5). 5 See e.g. Hannoun v R Limited and Banque SYZ Company Limited [2009] CILR 124. Although a lack of standing does not automatically render a petition a nullity see e.g. In the matter of Natural Dairy (NZ) Holdings Limited unr......
  • Gao v China Biologic Products Holdings Incorporated
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 10 Diciembre 2018
    ...to. (14)Gross v. Lewis Hillman Ltd., [1970] Ch. 445; [1969] 3 W.L.R. 787; [1969] 3 All E.R. 1476, distinguished. (15)Hannoun v. R Ltd., 2009 CILR 124, referred to. (16)Hogg v. Cramphorn Ltd., [1967] Ch. 254; [1966] 3 W.L.R. 995; [1966] 3 All E.R. 420, dicta of Buckley, J. considered. (17)Ho......
  • Kbc Investments Ltd Appellant v Geoffrey Varga as Official Liquidator of The Company Respondent
    • Cayman Islands
    • Court of Appeal (Cayman Islands)
    • 27 Abril 2015
    ...of this court holding that a mere beneficial owner of shares could not maintain a derivative action on behalf of a company; and Hannoun v R Ltd [2009 CILR 124], in which the Grand Court held that a beneficiary under a bare trust of shares could not petition for a winding-up on the just and ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • When Is A Shareholder Actually A Shareholder?
    • Bermuda
    • Mondaq Bermuda
    • 24 Agosto 2016
    ...a beneficial owner may have sufficient standing to maintain a derivative claim'. The recent Cayman Islands cases include Hannoun v R Ltd [2009] CILR 124 and Re Lancelot Investors Fund, KBC Investments Ltd v Varga, Cayman Islands Court of Appeal, unreported 27 April 2015, and the recent BVI ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT